By Mildred Robertson
Many Americans
watched in disbelief as former president Donald J. Trump broke almost every
rule established to define the boundaries of presidential power. While
Democrats attempted to hold Trump accountable for his myriad infractions, on
two occasions the Republican-led Congress failed to discipline the twice
impeached president. Trump’s blatant disregard for the Constitution resulted in
norm-busting practices which, if left to stand, may signal a failed democracy. While both the executive and legislative
branches of our government were obviously faltering, Americans maintained hope
as the judicial branch continued to safeguard our democracy by ruling in favor
of constitutional norms. Many courts across the country continue to stand on
the watchtower to protect our freedoms…but not all.
As chaos overtakes
every part of the American political system, the Supreme Court is the final leg
of our government to buckle under the weight of partisan politics. The nation’s
foundation has been shaken by this week’s revelation that Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas may have based his judicial decision on the release of records
to the January 6th Committee on the involvement of his wife in the planning
and execution of the January 6th insurrection. During a Capitol news conference on March 31,
2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, called for a code of ethics for the
Supreme Court stating, "If your wife is an admitted and proud contributor
to a coup of our country, maybe you should weigh that in your ethical
standards."
The Founders
constructed our constitution with a series of checks and balances designed to
ensure that one flawed branch of government would not be able to undermine our
democracy. In theory, each branch is endowed with individual powers to check
the other branches and prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. In 2022, that theory seems to be failing
the test. It appears our U.S. Supreme Court may
be the latest casualty of partisan politics to foreshadow our nation’s possible
demise.
The Supreme Court, the
highest court in the land, is the final arbiter of constitutional issues with
which this country must grapple. While bills passed by Congress must be signed by
the president, Congress still has the power to override a presidential veto,
resulting in a balance of power. However, there is no power above the Supreme
Court to call its actions into question. Justices have a lifetime appointment
meant to insulate them from partisan influence. However, they can also become
insular, making decisions to please themselves rather than to protect the
constitution.
The Court has, in the
past, been made up of individuals who leaned either left or right, but who
could be persuaded by the facts of a particular case based on the constitution.
These swing votes provided for a more fair hearing of controversial issues that
came before the court. However, then-Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has
manipulated Court appointments by denying both President Barack Obama and
President Joe Biden the opportunity to fill Supreme Court vacancies. In 2016 he refused to bring
Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland to a vote, even though there remained 8 months
in his presidency. Likewise, he rushed through the nomination of Amy Coney
Barret only weeks before Biden’s election in order to deny him the opportunity
to fill the seat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg who passed on September 18, 2020. These
ideologues carry the banner for far-right issues such as anti-abortion and
other conservative standards. In addition to a Court packed with rightwing
enthusiasts, we now have a justice who seems to overlook rules of ethics in his
decision-making.
Whether Clarence
Thomas recuses himself from cases surrounding January 6th, at this
point, is left up to no one but him. However, there is something that can be
done to restore the balance of power on the highest court in the land. Congress has the power under Article III of
the Constitution to add seats to the Supreme Court. This is not an
unprecedented move. The size of the Court has changed 7 times in American
history. There should also be an effort to depoliticize the Supreme Court by
creating term limits. This would give each president the opportunity to appoint
justices each term, thereby making it more representative. Finally, the Court should be held accountable by instituting a binding code
of ethics that requires recusal in cases of proven conflicts of interest.
In a blog post
written in 2019, I said: “America stands at a crossroads. As the President of the United
States engages in an all-out attack on this nation’s constitution, it occurs to
me that the boundaries of our constitution are being challenged. We are about
to witness whether our constitution, as framed by our Founding Fathers, can
withstand the onslaught of a lawless president.” Little did I know at that time that those challenges would lay as
well at the feet of our legislature and our Supreme Court! Unprecedented challenges to all three branches
of our government threaten the very democracy that makes us unique among
nations. We must fight to maintain our
democracy. We must fight to ensure our government works in the manner the
Founders intended. To that end, we must expand the Supreme Court to restore
balance, and preserve our nation.
2 comments:
If you're pro-democracy you would support letting the American people vote on the legality of abortion rather than having nine unelected lawyers decide it. Instead, the "pro-democracy" party wants to change all of the rules so it can solidify its power, including court-packing (a feature of every tinpot dictatorship and an idea that was rejected by solid bipartisan majorities so no president would even think about trying it again).
We salute your work and we agree that the court is the most dangerous weapon in the hands of white evangelicals
Post a Comment