By Mildred Robertson
In-person early voting began in North Carolina today, October 15, 2026 and runs through Saturday, October 31 at 3 p.m. Election day, where you cast your ballot at your assigned precinct, is Tuesday, November 3rd.
By Mildred Robertson
In-person early voting began in North Carolina today, October 15, 2026 and runs through Saturday, October 31 at 3 p.m. Election day, where you cast your ballot at your assigned precinct, is Tuesday, November 3rd.
By: Mildred Robertson
Voters nationwide will soon head to the polls to cast their ballots in the 2026 election. The choice between Republicans and Democrats is relatively clear-cut. Most voters have already decided whether they favor a Blue Wave or prefer to maintain the status quo.
In North Carolina’s Wake County
there are several issues voters need to be prepared to address when they enter
the voting booth. For instance, there are 3 amendments in this election cycle that
many will not consider until they flip over the ballot and read them for the first
time.
The constitutional amendments on
the Wake County Ballot that may be confusing for the electorate. At first
glance, the issues may appear clear cut. But a “yes vote” may miss some nuances that
may not be readily identified by some voters. For instance, North Carolina already requires
voter ID to participate in the election. According to BALLOTPEDIA, a search
encyclopedia of American Politics:
“As of 2024, state law required individuals using mail-in absentee ballots to include a photocopy of identification. State law provided for an ID exception form if the voter could not present ID, providing a reason such as the ID being lost or stolen, lack of transportation, disability or illness, religious reasons, experiencing a natural disaster within 100 days before the election, and more. For mail voters unable to attach a photocopy, the voter's driver's license number or last four digits of social security number could be substituted.”
The
Constitutional Amendment would require the photo ID of all voters. Simply
providing a driver’s license number or the last four digits of the SSI would no
longer be sufficient.
Opponents say
this measure is designed to disenfranchise voters by mail; making it more
difficult for students, older people and people with disabilities to vote by
mail in North Carolina. Republican proponents insist it is a commonsense security
measure.
Another
ballot measure is a constitutional amendment to keep the State income tax rate
from being raised higher than three and one-half percent (3.5%). This measure would permanently cap the rate
at 3.5%, although North Carolina legislators passed a budget in July that already
scheduled a drop from 3.99% to 3.49% effective 2027 -2029.
While this
proposal may sound attractive to many voters, Democrats worry that the cap is
unnecessary at this time and could limit the ability of the government to levy
taxes, even when essential services are threatened without additional funding. Issues
that might trigger the need for increased revenue include the need to fund
government services to accommodate population growth.
Similarly, A constitutional
amendment requiring limits on property tax increase by local governments could
hamstring communities by a one-size-fits all solution. Rep. Maria Cervania, a
Wake County Democrat and former County Commissioner says that “Bertie County is
not Mecklenburg County,” and that it is dangerous to set limits that may stifle
tax revenue growth for some local governments with differing needs.
While voters
are focused on national issues, such as the makeup of Congress, and which party
controls the state houses across America, local issues such as the state
constitutional amendments and school bonds deserve just as intense a look as do
these state-wide elections.
So, review
your sample ballot. Examine the amendments and bonds and familiarize yourself
with nonpartisan candidates on your ballot so you can make an informed decision
about who will be governing your community. It is your community; make sure
your choices are heard.
Inform yourself
and then vote THE ENTIRE ballot.
By Mildred Robertson
By Mildred Robertson
According to PBS NewsHour, this week Donald Trump barred CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. He accused the outlets of false, unfavorable, and anti-Republican coverage, but gave no enforcement details.
The Trump administration’s restrictions on press access raise a central democratic question: whether the government may limit journalists’ access in response to critical coverage. Retaliatory restrictions weaken First Amendment norms, reduce public access to independent reporting, and deepen distrust at a moment when voters need reliable information.
Among those reporters with whom Trump has clashed are Kaitlan Collins (CNN), who is known for asking uncomfortable follow-up questions; Jim Acosta (CNN) who refused to give up his microphone while asking about immigration; Kirsten Holmes (CNN) whom Trump accused of being fake news, calling her a "loud, boisterous person," and demanding that she "be quiet". Kelly O'Donnell (NBC News) stood up to Trump in the Oval Office and confronted him over his decision to ban competing news organizations from the executive branch complex. Numerous other news reporters and media outlets have come under attack from this administration for refusing to back down when asking the hard questions about Trump's policies. The administration currently is revoking press passes and denying West Wing access to any reporter representing CNN, MS NOW or Politico.
Although federal courts have consistently ruled against broad administrative efforts by the Trump administration to restrict press access he, nevertheless, warned other news outlets they might face similar restrictions. Critics say this action violates the First Amendment which allows individuals the right to express their thoughts and opinions without government censorship or punishment. The Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press..."
The dispute between news outlets and the Trump administration raises broader questions about the role of the free press in American politics. Constitutional protection of the press is rooted in the need to inform the public, scrutinize government, expose abuse, explain policy, and check political claims. It also seeks to facilitate the presentation of competing views and to highlight unfair treatment of U.S. citizens. The Trump administration appears to intend to muzzle all media who choose to report on the facts as they see them, rather than regurgitating the talking points of the administration.
While retaliation against media for criticism violates constitutional free speech norms Trump's efforts have resulted in a chilling effect on journalism and factual reporting by some U.S. news media outlets. Trump's attack on reporters and news outlets who refuse to report the administration's false narratives has already resulted in some media self-censoring in order not to antagonize him. Among those organizations is ABC and CBS/Paramount who admitted to self-censorship, legal settlements and programming shifts.
It appears that the United States has fallen in global rankings and lost its long-standing status as a "liberal democracy. This recent degrading of freedom of speech and of the press in the U.S. point to a severe and unusually rapid erosion of American democracy. In fact the Pew Research Center states that the Economist Intelligence Unit (the world leader in global business intelligence and market insights), classifies the country as a "flawed democracy." Experts say it is rare in modern history to see the pace of institutional decline currently being experienced in America.
The need to stop the decline of democracy is at the forefront of 2026 midterms. Americans have become acutely aware of the struggle this administration has with the truth. Pew Research states that 83% of Americans believe the U.S. government is suppressing important news from the public. However, they also distrust the news organizations and social media. This skepticism has resulted in a highly fractured political landscape where citizens struggle to find the truth in the various messages with which they are bombarded.
This is a particularly critical as voters wade through conflicting messages from this administration and news outlets to find the facts they need to vote their best interest in November. It is imperative that the media be free to research and report the facts as they see them, and then let the people decided what is the truth. That can't happen if this administration muzzles large portions of the free press, and only shares information with those who will positively promote the president's agenda.
Independent journalism supports democratic accountability. When reporting is limited to positive views of political actors, the media is weakened and reporting becomes a disservice to the American public. Limited access can favor official messaging, and sustained pressure may deter reporting and deepen distrust. The lack of fact-based reporting results in a misinformed public and leads to poor public policy making. It also leads to a lack of trust by other nations and world leaders.
By Mildred Robertson
My granddaughter turned 18 in July, 2026. One of the first things we did was visit the Wake County Board of Elections to register her to vote. She excitedly waited for her Voter ID to show up in the mail. And it did, this week. However, the last name on the voter ID card was not her last name.
By Mildred Robertson
As the 2026 midterms approach,
many Americans will tune in to the political battle immediately following the
Labor Day holiday. Voting should be easy, but the fact is that we may have to
struggle to cast our vote in 2026. However, we cannot be daunted or intimidated
as we work to ensure that our voices are heard.
That tactic, however, will not
prevail if voters are proactive in their preparation for the November 3rd
election. Every voter should have a plan on how they will ensure that their
vote is both cast and counted.
In North Carolina, a key state in
this year’s midterm, election boards across the state will begin to mail out
absentee ballots on September 4 to voters who requested them. In-person early
voting runs from October 15 through October 31. Voters will cast their ballots at their
designated precinct on election day, Tuesday, November 3, 2026. All those
options are open to every North Carolinian. Each of us should assume the
responsibility of making sure we are prepared to cast our vote in a way that
cannot be challenged.
Each voter should contact their county
board of elections to ensure that their name is still listed as active. Reasons
you may be suspended or purged from the roll is if you have moved since the
last election. You also might fall into this category if your name has changed
since you last voted. This is particularly important for women who may have changed
their name due to marriage or divorce. If your name has been suspended or purged
for any reason, you can submit an updated voter registration form through the
DMV website or your county registrar.
Another tactic by the Trump administration is to eliminate or change voting locations. You may have voted at the same location for years and find that that location is no longer a voting site. So, make sure when you check your registration that you also check your voting location. If you do end up at the wrong site on November 3, let the official know that you are not in your precinct and want to vote using a provisional ballot. The best way to ensure that your vote is cast and counted is to have a plan:
You can go online for status
notifications through BallotTrax, which is
available 30 days prior to the election.
This may be the most consequential
election of your lifetime. Make sure you are prepared. Make sure you are involved.
Make sure your vote counts on November 3, 2026.
By Mildred Robertson
Gary
Indiana, a predominantly Black community where roughly a third of residents
live below the poverty line, is struggling back from an unprecedented storm on
August 11 that left many without power or resources. The storm is reminiscent
of Katrina in New Orleans in 2005 where a lackluster federal response left
thousands of New Orleanians struggling to survive. While Gary residents don't have to contend with the prolonged flooding experienced by New Orleans residents, the lack of access to life's necessities post-disaster are similar.
Unfortunately, the vivid pictures of flooding that dominated the airwaves during the Katrina disaster have not occurred during the Gary, Indiana storm. Apparently, downed trees and damaged power lines are not as gripping or captivating for the media, as the heart-wrenching photos that came out of New Orleans. But the pain of the Indiana residents is just as real.
The
August 11 storms brought winds up to 99 mph to Northwest Indiana, downing trees
and power lines and initially leaving more than half of Gary without
electricity. Some residents entered a third week without power, creating the urgent
need for food, laundry, showers, phone charging, and other basic services.
NIPSCO,
one of Indiana's largest natural gas and electric companies, says it has
experienced about 374,500 customer outages since Aug. 11. The prolonged power outage affected more than
38,300 homes and businesses in Gary and government response has been slow. Power restoration for remaining customers was
expected by midnight on August 25, 2026.
The
lengthy restoration has fueled questions about NIPSCO's response and the
resilience of Gary's power grid, especially as neighboring communities recovered.
While Gary struggled, residents in nearby Indiana received a better response
rate to the disaster. ComEd restored nearly all customers across the state line
within days.
As of Monday morning, about 3,878 customers
remained without power because of the storms. While Gary has received federal
help through FEMA's emergency declaration, direct assistance to residents; food,
supplies, cooling and other necessities is largely coming from charities and
local and state efforts. The August 15 emergency
declaration allows FEMA to support state and local emergency protective
measures, but it does not automatically provide individual assistance directly
to households.
Gary
Mayor Eddie Melton met with U.S. Senator Jim Banks to discuss federal disaster
assistance and recovery needs. Melton also spoke with President Trump and urged
swift federal action for Gary residents and neighborhoods.
While
the disparity in restoration of services is troublesome, Gary apparently experienced
more severe weather than Indiana. The National Weather Service says the storm
intensified as it moved into Northwest Indiana, with a 99-mph gust recorded at
Gary/Chicago International Airport, a speed that falls within the range of
Category 2 hurricane winds.
Gary
residents have called out state leaders, including Gov. Mike Braun, who said
over the weekend that it was unacceptable that NIPSCO was taking so long to
restore power while Illinois communities across the border had already been
restored.
This
is bigger than a power outage in Gary, Indiana," Bernice King, civil
rights organizer and daughter of Martin Luther King Jr, said on social media.
"It is part of a pattern. Black communities have too often been expected
to endure conditions that would be treated as intolerable somewhere else."
Nonprofits,
businesses, volunteers, and public figures have stepped up to fill the void, providing
meals, supplies, funding, and other aid to affected residents. Raydia Martin,
assistant director of the Flourish Community Hub at Flourish Church in Gary,
said volunteers and community groups have been an important part of the
response. The Chicago Bears announced a $200,000 storm relief donation, split
evenly between Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago and Catholic
Charities of the Diocese of Gary. World Central Kitchen distributed about 4,000
meals in Gary and nearby Lake Ridge with help from local volunteers.
As
the city struggles to get back on its feet, the nation should examine partisan
politics in federal services. On August 20, Indiana submitted a major disaster request
seeking additional individual and public assistance, including possible FEMA
support for households affected by this disaster. Gov. Mike Braun petitioned the federal government for assistance in 54 counties after the severe storm decimated the state's power system. President Trump approved the request for 21 counties, less than half that number.
Eligible
residents in the designated counties can apply for grants of up to $5,000 to help cover immediate needs
such as clothing and uninsured medical devices. Those affected should document
damages and expenses and follow updates from the Indiana Department of Residents
to find more information through the Indiana
Department of Homeland Security.
· The
American Red Cross offers disaster
recovery resources on shelter, cleanup, and flood recovery. Call
1-800-733-2767 for assistance.
Public opinion on Donald Trump's standing on the world stage is dismissal. A multinational Pew Research Center report indicates that only 23% of adults across 36 countries worldwide express confidence in Trump to make good policy decisions on world affairs. His "America First" policies have strained relations with established Western allies, resulting in what appears to be an "America Alone" reality.
Some of his most unconventional and disruptive policies include threatening sweeping tariffs on our closest allies like Canada and Mexico, threatening to annex Greenland and Canada, declaring international waterways as under U.S. control, undermining NATO and pulling the U.S. from multilateral pacts such as the Paris Climate Agreement. He also has suggested that the U.S. should control the Strait of Hormuz and charge for use of the vital shipping lane. He radically cut or froze international development funding, including global health initiatives.
He has used the influence and might of the most powerful nation on this planet to play petty games, and one-up world leaders. His policies have denied food to starving people in Ethiopia while food rots in African harbours. He has disrupted the flow of lifesaving malaria prevention efforts and HIV/AIDS drug programs. He has rolled back the clock on climate change, erasing the positive strides of the Biden administration in the Paris Agreement on climate change.
His positions on Ukraine, Gaza and Panama are haphazard. They are based on whim, rather than actual facts, planning and expertise. All of these policies have negatively impacted the world economy and threatened social stability worldwide.
Nevertheless, world leaders still bow at his feet, strategizing about how to interact without triggering him. It is unbelievable to me that the entire WORLD seems to allow this toddler to throw tantrums as the world order devolves into a quagmire of his creation.
Who will stop him? Clearly the American voter has not, up to this point, been able to do so. Perhaps November will show us a different America. Perhaps, in November, voters will stop looking for the PERFECT solution and pursue an ACHIEVABLE solution. Perhaps in November America will give the world something new to work with...a way to repair the damage inflicted by this toddler-king who still has not made it out of his diaper.
By Mildred Robertson
A motion filed by Capital One in a Florida federal court refutes that claim, stating that the decision followed several months of internal review by its Financial Crimes Compliance Team. The court filing over this past weekend requested that the lawsuit be dismissed, stating that “The closures were the result of months of analysis and careful review by Capital One’s AML team in accordance with bank policies and regulatory guidance.”
According to
Capital One, AML is an internal financial crimes and risk-compliance unit that
investigates suspicious transactions, screens customer accounts against global
watchlists, and ensures adherence to federal bank regulations. AML cited
patterns in the flagged Trump accounts that were consistent with those identified
through federal banking guidance as suspect.
By Mildred Robertson
In a 6-3 decision issued on June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down limits on how much political parties may spend in coordination with candidates. The ruling allows wealthy donors to channel far larger sums through political parties, giving them greater power to shape campaign messaging and election outcomes.
The
Court held that post-Watergate limits on coordinated spending between political
parties and candidates violate the First Amendment. With those limits removed,
parties and outside political groups can play a larger role in financing
campaign advertisements and related expenses.
Supporters
argue that campaign spending is a form of political speech protected by the
First Amendment. Critics counter that the ruling increases the risk of
corruption by giving wealthy donors and special interest groups outsized
influence over elections. In effect, they argue, the decision makes political
power more available to those who can afford to spend the most.
Grassroots
candidates can still build support through many small-dollar donations, but
that model may struggle to compete with unlimited spending from corporations
and wealthy donors. As more money flows into television, print, and social
media advertising, small-dollar donors and ordinary voters may find their
voices increasingly drowned out.
Put
simply, these rulings give the wealthiest participants the loudest megaphone.
Those with the most money will have the greatest ability to shape public messaging,
influence opinion, and impact voting outcomes.
Many
elected officials already respond to high-dollar donors by supporting
legislation that aligns with donor priorities. As Super PACs, political
parties, and wealthy contributors spend more aggressively, this influence is
likely to grow. In practical terms, the decision moves American democratic rule further toward a system where political power is increasingly shaped by those
able to spend the most, and that is not democracy.
Sources:
PBS:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/supreme-court-transforms-campaign-finance-rules-lifting-limits-on-party-spending
Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/30/campaign-spending-supreme-court-ruling-00980450
By Mildred Robertson
I will not celebrate America's 250th Anniversary on July 4th 2026. It should be a joyous occasion where we all look back on how far we have come, and all the many wonderful accomplishments that made this country a leader among nations. Those accomplishments are real...documented...impressive. Generally, in a blog such as this, I would list them...laud them. But not today. Today I flipped through my facebook pages and found evil, despicable stories and comments that overshadow all the good that this country has brought forth, because it has been equally efficient in birthing violence, hate, injustice and racism.
On Sunday night, the president of these United States hosted a taxpayer funded UFC fight...that's right, a cage fight, supposedly to honor our 250th anniversary and his 80th birthday. This uncouth display had all the trappings of a trailer park brawl with no dignity and no mention of this country's storied history which it supposedly was celebrating. Instead UFC fighter Josh Hokit took the opportunity to slander former first lady Michelle Obama during a post-fight speech.
I won't repeat the offense, but you all know it. According to CNN journalist Alejandra Jaramillo, Trump, who was seated on the front row, "appeared to show a half-smile seconds after the false remark." Apparently there was a mixture of cheers and boos from the crowd. The fact that there were enough attendants who audibly cheered such mean-spirited behavior made me ashamed of the Republican crowd who supported this event. But what triggered me today is the number of Americans from across the country who support and display that same behavior and are willing to put it in writing on Facebook.
While Michelle Obama did not go low...apparently, she plans to go to court. It is my hope that she is successful in stripping Hokit of his earnings from his despicable performance in that cage that you and I payed for.
But that wasn't all. On that same day, a Mississippi police officer took the life of a 1-year-old over the alleged theft of a box of pampers. Yes, you read that right. Little Kohen Wiley was shot and killed by Senatobia Mississippi police officers called to the local Walmart for his parent allegedly stealing a box of pampers. The police claimed they shot into the vehicle in a public parking lot because the driver tried to run over them. (That is a story we've heard before...I will wait for the video.)
Now, it is bad enough that this incident occurred, but the numerous Facebook posts that try to justify the taking of this child's life is heart-wrenching. They do not ascribe any fault to the police officers..."the driver should not have headed toward the officers, nearly hitting them." But the tragedy of the snuffing out of this baby's life causes them no grief. It elicits no sympathy. They acknowledge neither his humanity nor his innocence.
That is the America I cannot celebrate. All of America's storied history is muddied, defiled by its inability to acknowledge the cruelty, hatred and bigotry that is buried beneath its gloried accomplishments; attributes that allowed it to build its success on the backs of blacks and other minorities who to this day have not been acknowledged as fully American, or even fully human.
So there will be no fireworks for me. There will be no celebration. Instead, I will celebrate Juneteenth, which commemorates when many of my people learned of the Emancipation Proclamation, a proclamation that to this day has not been fully realized. Because of that, I see no reason to celebrate this historic anniversary.
Just because Renee Good, Alex Pretti, and Keith Porter are no longer in the news does not mean they are not still dead.
By, Mildred Robertson
The NC Alliance of Black Elected
Officials held it’s 20th Annual NC Black Summit April 23-24 at
the Raleigh Marriott Crabtree Valley. This year’s theme of "Unleashing
OUR Power, United in Purpose," provided a platform for Black leaders throughout the state to
connect, share their experiences, and collaborate on addressing mutual
challenges. The organization’s foundation was built on the belief that
collective problem-solving among community leaders would strengthen advocacy
and foster positive change.
Challenges and Growth
Over the past twenty years, both the state and nation have faced increasingly difficult challenges. Despite these growing pressures, the NC Black Alliance has not only endured but has grown stronger, showcasing remarkable resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity. The organization’s current strength reflects its enduring mission and the unwavering dedication of its members.
Among the Alliance’s many accomplishments are its efforts to train the next generation of African American elected officials While there is no comprehensive public database tracking every North Carolina Black elected official since 2006 at local, municipal, and state levels, representation now includes numerous municipal leaders, dozens of state legislators, and several members of Congress. The Alliance fosters collaboration among these officials on critical policy and advocacy issues, including education, economic and environmental justice, and affordable housing. Additionally, the Alliance encourages civic engagement through training initiatives and voter mobilization, and it advocates for financial literacy and equitable economic opportunities within Black communities.
Over the past two decades, the
difficulties facing both the state and nation have become significantly more
pressing. Despite these heightened challenges, the NC Black Alliance has grown
stronger, demonstrating resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity.
The strength of the organization today is a testament to its enduring mission
and the dedication of its members.
Statewide Advocacy
Thanks
to the persistent efforts of the NC Black Alliance, Black advocacy remains
vibrant and effective throughout the state. The organization continues to serve
as a driving force for progress, ensuring that the voices of Black leaders are
heard and their concerns are addressed.