By Mildred Robertson
There is a firestorm in North Carolina
over the N.C. Department of Public Instruction’s proposal to teach American
history as it occurred rather than whitewashing it to show that our nation has
always lived up to the lofty expectations set out in our constitution. It
appears that teaching our students the truth about America’s founding, its
slaughter of native Americans, its enslavement of Africans and its abuse of
former slaves and other minorities is just too much for some in the state to
bear.
DPI’s move to ensure diversity and inclusion
in the standard K-12 curriculum is opposed by GOP Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson who said
Wednesday he has collected 27,000 signatures in an online petition calling on
the state board to reject the new standards. Robinson, who is black, (More about him another time), said
public education has become so anti-conservative that he has not been allowed
to speak at schools while activities such as Black Lives Matter are promoted.
However, this is not an issue of
conservative versus progressive; but rather an issue of fact over fiction. I
recall when I was in middle school in Missouri when I had a heated disagreement
with my history teacher over the inventor of the cotton gin. I was taught that
Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, but in my individual studies, with
prompting from my “woke” sisters, I had learned that slaves had invented many of
the tools and practices that were attributed to their white owners. In my
search for truth I found that Eli Whitney’s slaves invented the cotton gin. However,
they were his chattel (not considered
human therefore ineligible to file a patent). Their discoveries were
attributed to him. He patented the cotton gin in 1794. Needless to say, when I stated
as much on my test, my answer was marked wrong. She was incensed, even though I
had provided her with proof that what she was teaching was incorrect.
That was more than 50 years ago, yet many
white Americans still seem to struggle with the incongruence of history with perceived
reality. Why is it so hard to state that America was a land stolen from its
original owners and its economy built on the backs of enslaved people? Why would such a statement be considered
divisive? Is it, perhaps, because this
nation has yet to take the first step toward reconciliation with those that
have been wronged—acknowledgement of guilt!
We must teach our children the
struggles this nation has endured in order to arrive at this place in history.
We have to let them see what we did wrong, as well as what we did right. How else can they be expected to make better
decisions?
The American experiment is an awesome,
somewhat successful one. But it is not
without flaws. Our country has brutalized many on its trek toward becoming the
most powerful nation in the world. Non-Europeans
have borne the brunt of that brutality. But America has historically failed to
admit the brutality and disparity that accompanied its progress.
Looking back toward slavery and its
aftermath, forty acres and a mule would have been nice. But could those of you
who wield the reigns of authority simply agree to those dark chapters of our
nation’s history and codify methods to ensure that parity will be pursued in
the future? Can we work toward building a nation where justice and equality are
jealously safeguarded in our current social and political endeavors? Can we
strive to see our past failures so they won’t be replicated in our future?
Can we simply teach our children the
truth?