Disney Cancels Kimmel - I Cancelled Disney

 By Mildred Robertson

As I watch America spiraling into an autocratic dictatorship, I am appalled at how easy it has been for various entities to cave to government overreach. This administration has attacked regulatory bodies, infringed upon civil liberties, and used government power to impose regulations that burden individuals and businesses who do not bow down to the whims of America's authoritarian leadership.  

Trump's administration has an amoeba-like predisposition to absorb the power and authority regulating state and federal governmental agencies, large businesses, and corporations. He has cowed the United States Congress into relinquishing its oversight responsibilities and has launched an attack on fundamental constitutional rights. 

In the most recent affront to American democracy, ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show due to his comments regarding Charlie Kirk's shooting. The late-night show host remarked, "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish," referring to Trump's reaction to Kirk's murder on September 10 while addressing an audience on the campus of Utah Valley University.  

While Kirk's shooting is horrific, so is the governmental response to his execution. This administration is using this tragedy, an American tragedy that affects all of us, as a rallying cry to continue Trump's vindictive attack on all who would have the courage to oppose him. 

Charlie Kirk was a purveyor of hatred who, unfortunately, died while in the throes of promoting it. I have empathy for those who loved him because all deaths are sad, and all murders are unconscionable. But to lionize this man, while ignoring the violent attacks and murders of other politicians of differing ideologies, is just a ploy to justify the governmental overreach in which this administration is already engaging. 

As I watch this administration roll away my rights and freedoms under the Constitution, I often wonder what I can do to make a difference. I write this blog. I donate to causes that support my beliefs and American ideals. And now, I cancelled my subscription to Disney, which is the parent company of ABC, which cancelled the Kimmel show based on his comments.  If we cannot have the free flow of thought in our country, WE cannot be free. 

It's not much. But it is the best I can do to say enough!

You can do it too. These businesses are following the money. Let them know that your dollars will go elsewhere if they continue to acquiesce to this authoritarian regime. 

Death in America – Lethal Politics

By Mildred Robertson

As average Americans deal with the growing violence that blights our political landscape, many search for leadership that inspires unity over conflict. It is a travesty that Charlie Kirk was gunned down in the middle of a university campus, although he was there to espouse violent, hateful ideas. He had a right to his beliefs and the right to champion them. However, it is no less a travesty that he contributed to the hate and violence Americans have come to accept as normal. Kirk defended our weak response to gun control following a school massacre by saying, "Yes, people die from gun violence. It's tragic. But that's the price of freedom. Unfortunately, it's worth it to keep the Second Amendment intact."

It appears political violence is on the rise in America.  From the 2011 Tucson shooting, where then Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot during a constituent meeting and six people were killed and 13 wounded, to the assassination of right-wing conservative Charlie Kirk, terrorists have used violence to silence ideas different from their own. While right-wing leadership calls for vengeance following the fatal shooting of radical activist Charlie Kirk, they remained silent during violent attacks on political figures with differing ideas.

While we perceive ourselves as an enlightened nation that values political freedom, our history presents a different perspective.  We are a violent country. Our turbulent history dates back to the colonies and the destruction of the indigenous population. We have romanticized the violence upon which our nation was built. We see ourselves as rugged, gun-toting individualists whose primary goal is to live free of others' opinions, wants, or needs.

 You can trace America’s appetite for violence from slavery, through the civil Rights movement, up to more recent history that includes the assassination of Medgar Evers, the slaying of Martin Luther King, Malcom X, and John and Robert Kennedy.

But we cannot stop there.  Our country has endured white terrorist attacks such as Timothy McVey’s bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma, the 13 domestic terrorists who attempted to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmore, and the home invasion on Nancy Pelosi and the physical assault on her husband.

Violence in our country is neither red nor blue, as we cite the attempted assassination of Ronald Regan, a mass shooting in 2017 that left five people injured, including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, and the attempted slaying of President Donald Trump.

In June 2025, state Sen. John Hoffman survived an assassination attempt when he and his wife were shot in their Minnesota home. The attack on the Hoffmans occurred before the political assassination of state Rep. Melissa Hortman, the former House speaker, and her husband, Mark. The assassin went as far as to kill their dog. The four were on a kill list of dozens of democrats targeted for assassination.

While Trump basically ignored these recent shootings against democrats, he has ordered flags to be raised to half-staff in honor of the fallen Kirk. His administration did not formally acknowledge Hortman’s assassination or attend or send a representative to her funeral. It appears that he considers himself president of only those who support him. Whereas major statesmen who preceded him have used times such as these to bring unity, he seems to care little about uniting the nation in this time of turmoil.

As America grapples with 9,400 threats of violence against politicians in this country in 2024, we must determine whether our rugged individualism tied to the 2^nd Amendment and the right to bear arms is more important than the right to live without fear of the gun violence that has overcome us in our schools, our streets, our churches and synagogues, and even within the halls of Congress.

As we struggle with the violence that has overtaken our country, Americans have a decision to make.  Do we want to unite as one nation under God? Are we willing to live in a true democracy where all voices are heard, and ideas are put to the test at a ballot box rather than the butt of a gun? Will we relinquish our love of the violent gun culture, or will we continue to normalize the lethal politics that currently govern our lives?

Rampant gun violence. Political terrorism. Is it REALLY worth it?

I would ask Charlie Kirk how he feels about it now. But I can’t, because he is a victim of his own rhetoric and America’s lethal politics.

Trump's Revenge Tour Continues

 By Mildred Robertson

Trump says he's firing Federal Reserve Gov. Lisa Cook, citing his administration’s allegations of mortgage fraud against her. Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve Board, responded by saying that Trump has no authority to fire her and she would continue to carry out her duties. Wealthy businessman Bill Pulte, who is Trump’s Federal Housing Finance Agency Director, alleged that Cook had committed mortgage fraud. While she has not been formally prosecuted or charged, Trump made the bold, and possibly unconstitutional, decision to try to fire Cook.

And this is not a one-off. Pulte has alleged mortgage fraud against California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom have been strong Trump adversaries. Schiff was a member of the House Select Committee charged with investigating the January 6^th attack on the United States Capitol. James successfully prosecuted Trump and his sons Eric and Don Jr., which resulted in limits on their ability to do business in New York City. A court this week dismissed the massive monetary penalty she won in this case, but the limits on their ability to do business in New York currently remain in effect.

The decision to go after Cook is likely fueled by Trump’s desire to control the Federal Reserve. To date, his primary target at the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, appears to be more difficult to take down. Powell heads a seven-member board that serves 14-year terms.  The board is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. They oversee the Federal Reserve and help set monetary policy.

Trump has come into conflict with the board because he wants interest rates down now. He has attempted to strong-arm Federal Reserve Chair Powell into lowering the rates for months now. Powell has yet to comply.  

That’s where Pulte comes in. Trump's feeble attempt to fire Powell seems stymied by  the fact that the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 states that the Federal Reserve Board of Governors can only be removed by the president “for cause.” Trump tried unsuccessfully to base dismissal for cause against Powell on cost overruns on the central bank’s $2.5 billion headquarters renovation.  Having failed at that, alleging fraud against Cook, the only African American woman on the board, may allow him to achieve his desired results.

As Trump continues his revenge tour, Cook, along with James and Schiff, all deny wrongdoing, stating that the prosecutions are politically motivated. This is not hard to believe, in that Trump has vowed that his second term would be one of retribution against all who have opposed him.

California's Gavin Newsome Armed for the Fight

 By Mildred Robertson

Texas Democrats made a bold move to flee the state, denying Republicans the quorum they need to bring legislation to the floor. Already highly gerrymandered, Texas Republicans plan to pass legislation that could create as many as five new pro-Republican districts, thereby strengthening the Republican stronghold on the U.S. Congress.  

In an unprecedented show of solidarity, Texas Democrats’ weeklong quorum break has stymied the Republican majority while facing threats to either arrest them and bring them back to the chamber or declare their seats vacant due to the quorum bust. The Republicans, however, are no less aligned as they doggedly move forward to pass legislation that will guarantee continued Republican dominance in Texas and the United States Congress.

Democrats' valiant but ill-fated attempt to stop the Texas Republicans raised national awareness of the cost to democracy if Republicans are allowed to pick their voters by drawing voting districts where they are predetermined to win. Their efforts have resulted in new strategies by Democrat-run states to counter Texas’s move to redraw maps mid-decade to steal Democratic-leaning seats and maintain congressional leadership.

Most Democrats are inclined to follow political precedent, regardless of the lawless or unethical actions of the GOP.  Common thought implies that Democrats consistently bring a knife to a gun fight when dealing with Republican lawlessness. This is evidenced by the Democratic majority's hesitance to expand the Supreme Court when they were in power, although Republicans packed it with right-wingers.

Under Mitch McConnell’s leadership, the House stymied President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland eight months before an election, arguing voters should decide which presidential candidate should pick the next justice. He made an about-face when Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed during the final days of the first Trump administration, hastening the seating of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett days before the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to Joe Biden.

Several options were available to Democrats. Obama could have made an interim appointment to the Supreme Court, or the Democrats, who controlled Congress during Biden’s administration, could have expanded the court. Democrats chose to go with precedent. Democrats, it appears, choose to play fair, even when their opponents don’t. They generally stand unarmed against the Republicans' ruthless pursuit of power.

But California Gov. Gavin Newsom laid down the knife and picked up a gun. His nuclear strategy involves states under Democratic control drawing maps to create additional safe districts in their respective states to counteract the Republican power grab.

Good for him.

While his tactics are being compared to the Republican power grab, they are not the same. First, Newsome plans to put this proposed change on the California ballot. That means that California’s redistricting would be sanctioned by its constituents. Furthermore, the redrawn maps would only go into effect if triggered by a Republican state attempting to redraw maps that disenfranchise voters and impact the makeup of Congress.  

Having said that...it's a terrible policy. but Democrats are left with few choices.  Knife, or gun? Under the circumstances, Newsome and other Democratic-dominated states are doing the best they can with a bad situation. It is like the strategy of mutual assured destruction and nuclear annihilation. Don't drop the bomb, and nobody will die.

Trump's Misuse of the Presidential Pardon

 By Mildred Robertson

The power to pardon offers a president the opportunity to apply justice, mercy, and promote the public welfare to those who have fallen from favor with the general society. When granted to a worthy recipient, a presidential pardon can help individuals regain their lives and become productive citizens.  It removes roadblocks to acquiring gainful employment, reinstates voting rights, and reestablishes the individual as a productive member of society.

There certainly are situations where mercy is required.  It appears that most Americans approve of presidents commuting prison sentences for those extraordinary cases where continued incarceration seems unjust. There are cases where individuals were wrongly convicted. Some convictions are the outcome of prejudiced juries or prosecutors who have pursued convictions zealously despite evidence of innocence. Even some convicts have been exonerated by evidence arising from new technologies. In some instances, the sentence does not match the crime. Humans run our justice system, and sometimes we make mistakes.

A presidential pardon can be a mechanism to help bring fairness and mercy to the system.  However, there must be parameters. Our current president appears to use his pardon power to insulate himself from wrongdoing. Criminals ranging from disgraced Congressman George Santos to infamous individuals such as Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and Ghislaine Maxwell have sought pardons from President Trump. It appears his pardons are based upon personal relationships rather than the stipulations of the Constitution regarding presidential commutations. While the Constitution grants the President the authority to grant clemency, the presidential pardon power is not boundless, as Trump claims.  The Constitution outlines several limitations. Donald Trump's use of his pardon power exceeds the constraints found in the Constitution.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs is alleged to have sought a presidential pardon

First and foremost, the president is bound to faithfully execute the laws as prescribed by the Constitution, which requires that pardons serve the public’s interest, not for “self-dealing, self-protection, or other bad faith personal reasons. Pardons cannot be used as a form of bribery. It cannot be used to hinder a criminal investigation or to persuade a witness to withhold incriminating evidence or offer false testimony. It is not a means of self-protection for the president.
Trump’s pardon of all who participated in the January 6^th assault on the Capitol, a clearly treasonous act, flies in the face of the Constitution. Many of the pardoned individuals have been involved in criminal activities following Trump’s pardoning, some of whom have landed back in jail. Trump’s possible pardon of convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell smacks of self-dealing. It is a fact that his name is included in the Epstein files, and Maxwell may have incriminating evidence that ties Trump to the more salacious aspects of the case. While he attacks immigrants, accusing them of being rapists and murderers, he offers Maxwell sympathy and well wishes. 

While we wrestle with this unorthodox administration, we must examine the liberties Trump takes with his presidential powers. There are many reasons for the presidential pardon to exist. Using it to place oneself above the law is not among them.

Artificial Intelligence – Just Give me the Facts, Please

 

By Mildred Robertson

While artificial intelligence (AI) has improved various aspects of our lives, it also has its drawbacks. Because human beings must program it, an individual can insert their own biases into the output that we receive. Trash in, trash out.

A case in point is Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot platform.  That someone as damaged as Elon Musk has control over the AI's response to inquiries should trouble everyone who uses AI to search for facts. While we think it is just a machine compiling data, it is compiling that data based on the biases of its programmer.  So, we must tread carefully. It is human to search for data that supports our own beliefs, even when we want facts.

I don't know how to remove that fault from artificial intelligence.  Those of us who consume its output must be aware that biases exist and that we should balance the data received with that from other reputable sources.  When we engage in research, we must remain cognizant that our own biases influence our quest for truth.

Without appropriate oversight, AI can do more harm than good. Musk's use of this platform to advance his priorities and beliefs compromises the integrity of the platform.  Recently, a message was sent via Signal that copied Secretary of State Marco Rubio's voice and style to establish a connection and obtain inside information. The initiative failed, but bad actors will continue to distribute fake messages mimicking a politician or industry leaders until they are successful.  Cybersecurity is not what it should be, and the public is at the mercy of AI as it helps bad actors steal our information and fake our news.

Key ethical implications of the explosion of AI are that it can amplify the biases of its developers. Further AI may compromise privacy and data security, leaving vital privacy constraints to creators who may or may not have the public’s best interest at heart.  It is the developers who must create strict data protection methods to ensure that your data is not used without your knowledge or consent. But will they?

And then there is the question of who is accountable if AI makes a mistake?

AI presents the possibility of financial fraud through market manipulation. Political and social manipulation is already occurring as we see politicians and celebrities who have literally had words put in their mouths by deep fakes running rampant on the internet. Many deepfakes appear surprisingly authentic, causing people to share as though they were true.

As we stand on the brink of the next midterm election, we must all learn how to utilize this technology to get to the truth. We must seek reputable news sources and be mindful not to share information that we have not vetted for accuracy. Sometimes the most recent poll sounds so hopeful, or the latest opposition scandal sounds so damning that we can’t wait to share it.

Searching for the truth is no easy task. But neither is maintaining democracy. True patriots will take the time to KNOW and not just go with the flow. Be mindful of what you read and hear in the news, broadcasts, and social media. Understand the source of information and its intent. Be careful what you add to the national discourse.

The nightmare scenario where AI-driven weapons fall into the hands of a madman, or the AI itself malfunctions and acts outside its protocols, no longer seems far-fetched. What once seemed simply like science fiction is now an attainable outcome of advancing AI technology.

We want “I, Robot” to remain a science fiction movie and not become our reality. We want “The Terminator” to be the musings of a vivid imagination, and not our lived reality. We want Chat GPT to provide unbiased data so that relevant truths guide our actions.

This blog is MY opinion. My truth and that of Elon Musk are very different. I don’t want AI to base its conclusion on either; just give me the facts!

 

The Big Beautiful Bill - Ugly to the Bone

 By Mildred Robertson

It is more than ironic that on the 249th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Americans stand to lose the battle it fought with Britain almost 250 years ago. Not to some great superpower that overtook us in war. Not from some foreign adversary that outflanked us, and launched cyber-attacks, nuclear bombs, or drone strikes, but by supposed American patriots. The "Big Beautiful Bill," fostered by a would-be dictator and supported by almost every Republican in Congress, is ugly to the bone. 

H.R. 1, the supposed Big Beautiful Bill, is not an idea or a concept. It is a reality that will affect the average American's household resources. Republicans, who fear a "Blue Wave" in 2026, crafted the bill so that the greatest impact of H.R. 1 won't be felt in the first two years of implementation. That design will stall many of the negative features of H.R. 1 until after the 2026 election. 

Ultimately, this huge transfer of funds will hit low-income Americans the hardest, decreasing or eliminating programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Medicaid, and Federal income tax credits. In fact, the biggest spending cuts target Medicaid and food stamps programs.  According to the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C. based think tank, of the 22.6 million families likely to lose resources, 57 percent are below the poverty line. Only 1 percent of high-income households will lose resources, while 27% of high earners will gain resources. 

Drawbacks of H.R. 1 include  

• tax cuts for the rich
• loss of vital health, nutrition, and economic resources 
• an estimated 11.8 million who will lose health insurance by 2034
• an estimated 3.3 trillion added to the national deficit over the next decade

Clearly, implementation of this bill will result in the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, despite the rhetoric being offered by Republican mouthpieces. Eventually, the unsubstantiated beauty of this bill will belie its ugly core. Over the span of its life, H.R. 1 will alter the kind of nation we have grown to be. It will blunt the vision of the Founders' "more perfect union and lessen the growth that America has experienced over the past 249 years.

As those of us who see the travesty in this bill understand how ugly it is, we can only look forward to the mid-terms with hope. Unfortunately, even if a Blue Wave occurs in 2026, hope can only do so much. The damage has been done. It will take years to undo the domestic attack on American society that this ugly-to-the-bone bill embodies.

Today, July 4, 2025, we celebrate our founding yet still yearn for liberty.