By: Mildred Robertson
The buzz phrase among republicans and conservatives these days is “Critical
Race Theory," (CRT) defined as “an academic movement of civil-rights scholars
and activists in the United States seeking to critically examine U.S. law as it
intersects with issues of race in the U.S. and to challenge mainstream American
liberal approaches to racial justice.” Seems simple enough, right? But
the term has been weaponized to attack a national shift toward better
understanding racism and how it is rooted in this nation’s history of slavery
and the dehumanization of people of color.
There is disagreement between liberals and conservatives about what is “critical race theory.” In fact, CRT is just that, a theory of race and racism in America. It is taught primarily in colleges and universities and is designed to help students examine race in America and understand how it has informed America’s societal norms and public policy related to people of color. It is not, as many on the right proclaim, a way to make white children hate America. The aim of the study is to examine American history and address the dehumanizing effects race has had not only on the Africans who suffered through slavery, but also on the slave owners who had to forgo their humanity in order to enslave another human being.
The knee-jerk reaction of conservatives, and
yes, racists, when one begins to examine slavery is to downplay the cruelty and
inhumanity of the system, and paint it as a benevolent necessity for
development of the New World. And it is true that America could not have
thrived as it did without the free labor the system provided. But because of
the brutality of the system, Europeans had to create a scenario to justify
their actions. That is why the African was portrayed as a savage, less than
human…not entitled to human dignity or human comforts. Public policy in America
was then created based upon this concept of the innate inferiority of enslaved
people.
For instance, in the 1930s, government
officials literally drew lines around areas deemed poor financial risks, often
explicitly due to the racial composition of inhabitants. Banks subsequently
refused to offer mortgages to Black people in those areas. Today the pattern
continues as cities prevent affordable housing developments in majority white
neighborhoods. These are not pleasant facts, but they are part of the
foundation upon which this nation was built. In order to create a more just
society, we must examine how America came to be and the integral part played by
enslaved people in its building.
It is alleged that the study of CRT will
create a greater divide between whites and blacks, and will negatively impact
the perception of America by white children exposed to it. However, there is a
difference between CRT taught in colleges and universities, and the simple
teaching of history in public schools.
History is fact-based. It simply tells what
happened, when it happened, where it happened, who it happened too, and
sometimes examines why it happened. Our public schools must present students
with historical facts as they occurred. Public education should
present an authentic retelling of this country’s history.
Our storied history is a saga of good and
evil. We offer our children a disservice if we do not present our authentic
selves to them, and provide them the tools to build on the good and reject the
bad. That is the only way to make our society better. We are not responsible
for the bad decisions made centuries ago; but we are responsible for the ones
we make now.
We can address the legacy of slavery that
plagues our nation to this day by creating thoughtful, truthful,
age-appropriate curriculum to address race in America. We can only do that,
however, if we face the reality of our history and chart an informed path for
our future.