Trayvon Martin, Black Male, George Zimmerman

Trayvon Martin Found Guilty of Being Black

By Mildred Robertson
 

I have been amazed to watch the trial of George Zimmerman in the murder of Travon Martin in Sanford Florida. It occurred to me this morning as I watched clips from the trial, that it is ludicrous that anyone would think that there is any way to justify the actions of George Zimmerman on that tragic evening. Who was on top, who threw the first punch – all irrelevant points.

The only misconduct that occurred was born in George Zimmerman’s mind as he profiled a young black man and determined him to be “suspect” based on nothing other than the fact that he existed, and had the audacity to exist in Zimmerman’s space. The only crime that occurred was that George Zimmerman stalked and then killed a kid who simply took a walk to pick up some skittles and a soda. The only thing Trayvon Martin could have done to avoid this tragedy is not to exist in the time and space that put him in Zimmerman’s path.

It takes me back to a dramatic scene in the movie “A Time to Kill” when the defense attorney asked the jurors to close their eyes while he graphically described the rape of a little black girl on her way home from the grocery store. After recounting the horrific acts committed against the child, he told the jurors, their eyes still closed, “Now, imagine she is white.” The moment was stunning as the jurors’ eyes popped open, and you could see that they understood.

That powerful moment is one that needs to be re-lived in this real life tragedy. “Now imagine if Travon was white.” Had he been white, it is doubtful that Zimmerman would have even noticed him.

But he did notice him. He did feel threatened by him, despite the fact that there were no grounds for his distrust. He then stalked and killed him, because this one was not going to get away. It was a series of actions set in motion by George Zimmerman’s verdict that a young man like Travon had no right to be in his neighborhood.

It is clear to me that many people get it. To be a black male in America is to be automatically a threat for people like George Zimmerman. There was nothing Travon could have done to change the situation.

Once Zimmerman determined that Trayvon did not belong; that he was not entitled to the freedom to walk through the neighborhood of an acquaintance, that covering his head from the rain with a hoody was intimidating, that having an unfamiliar face made him suspect; the scene was set for tragedy – a tragedy born in Zimmerman’s mind that resulted in the death of an innocent young man.

And he was innocent, despite what the defense would have us to believe.

The defense would like us to believe that Trayvon was dangerous. He liked to fight. He smoked dope. Zimmerman was right in viewing him as dangerous.

Whether they are true or not, these allegations are irrelevant. Even if Trayvon had a fight daily, and took a hit from a joint every day, it would not justify a death sentence. And that is what Zimmerman gave him. He served as the judge, jury and executioner of a young man who had done no wrong, and seemed to have no intent to do so. 

If there is any justice in our system of law, George Zimmerman must pay for this crime. Failure to do so will fortify the racist assumption that the mere existence of a black man makes him suspect and subject to capital punishment at the hands of a vigilante.    

Legislature Stymies Obama Agenda

By: Mildred Robertson

 Arguably the most powerful man in the world, President Barack Obama still seems to have trouble keeping his House in order—and his Senate too.  Much like spoiled children, legislators carry on their antics late into the night, stopping only for snacks and bathroom breaks. The posturing of Sen. Rand Paul and other legislators doggedly working to thwart the President and his agenda, only offer a disservice to the American public whom they claim to represent.

We have faced self-imposed crisis, one after the other, for no other reason than to keep this president from implementing his agenda. Any victory for President Obama seems unacceptable to partisan politicians who have lost sight of the real reason they are in Washington D.C.

Whether I voted for them or not, they are SUPPOSED to represent me and the majority of other Americans who decided that Barack Obama’s plan for America is the best choice.

It appears that many of our legislators, although they refer to themselves as “The Tea Party” have forgotten the foundation of our Democracy. The American Revolution was not about taxation. It was about taxation without representation. Because of their single-minded opposition to the president, our government has stalled and no one is being represented.

I have watched the pundits on various news broadcasts who insist that the President “DO” something. What is it that they would have him do?

He has offered compromise. He has introduced proposals almost identical to those the opposing legislators introduced themselves. He has sent out surrogates to schmooze and negotiate. He has used his bully pulpit to appeal to the American public. But the opposition is so entrenched in the idea that the President should win no victory that they resist all such overtures.

Now, while they are doggedly fighting to ensure he doesn’t win, he seems to win anyway. He won the Detroit bailout, he won the Stimulus battle, he won the election, and he won healthcare reform. While slipping in the polls from time-to-time, he continues to win the hearts and minds of the American people. He has even won a shaky economic recovery. All of these victories came hard fought, and without any meaningful support from across the aisle.

The pundits are right. Something HAS to be done. But it is not up to the President to do it. It is up to us. We sent them to Washington D.C., and we need to bring them home!

NC Legislation Creates a Path to Opportunity for Ex-Felons

By Mildred Robertson

Do you want a convicted bank robber working as a teller in your bank – probably not. But you might want to give a chance to 25-year-old who served time for DUI, or possession of an illegal substance. With NC House Bill 208, that 25-year-old may stand a chance, because the measure would eliminate the check-off box on employment applications asking whether the applicant has a felony conviction on his or her record.

That check-off box has created an underclass of men and women who never get another chance to be productive citizens. Though these ex-felons may have paid their debt to society, they are summarily eliminated from most job interviews because of their record. In an already competitive job market, they don’t stand a chance.

So what do we as a society expect them to do?  If an ex-felon cannot work, and cannot get housing, what options are left for his or her survival?

I recall when I lived in New Orleans that a group of amazing street performers passed the hat to bystanders, asking them to “give a little to my house, so we don’t have to come into your house.” After a little uneasy laughter, the hat filled to overflowing. Their talent was undeniable. But so was their underlying message. With a little hustle and ingenuity, these young men had figured out a way to survive. But their street-wise philosophy made it clear that in the final analysis, survival was the goal.

And it is the goal of us all.

These people have already paid their debt to society. Many people are lured into the streets at an early age, seeing only the money that life can give them—money they think they cannot achieve anywhere else. By the time they learn the downside of this decision, they have acquired the new “scarlet letter,” the “F” that will close almost all doors to opportunity.

House Bill 208 would prohibit employers from asking job applicants about whether they are convicted felons. Basically, the measure eliminates the check-off box on employment applications about felony convictions.  Employers would only be able to ask such questions after they have made a conditional job offer to the applicant, or if the person is seeking a job where his or her felony might put the employer or the public at risk. Another bill, Senate Bill 91, would prohibit employers from asking applicants about expunged criminal records. Senate Bill 33 would require state licensing boards to review the circumstances under which they deny professional licenses.

All of this legislation is a move in the right direction. I applaud the North Carolina legislature for taking up this matter. This proposed legislation acknowledges that just because a person made a serious mistake, he or she should not be forever shunned. It also acknowledges that a pathway to good citizenship must exist in order for someone to take the path. Ultimately, our goal is to rehabilitate and allow people the dignity of making their own way. Call your representative and express your support for a pathway to opportunity for these individuals seeking to be productive members of our society.  

Cornel West, Tavis Smiley, President Obama, Martin Luther King, Bible

Dr. Cornel West, Still Trying to be Relevant

By:  Mildred Robertson

So as many of us are still on a euphoric high over the second inauguration of the first African American President of the United States, Cornel West is making noise, trying to be relevant.

West, who joined commentator Tavis Smiley in castigating the President because he did not “kiss their ring” as he ascended to the position of most influential Black man in America (the world), now wants to say that the President is unworthy to lay his hand on Martin Luther King’s bible. Ironically, West would have probably called Dr. King an “Uncle Tom” if he was leading his nonviolent revolution today. West speaks out of both sides of his mouth as he says he is glad right wing politicians did not overtake the White House, but then calls its current occupant a “Republican in blackface.” He disrespects both the office and the man, neither of which deserve it.

The troubles this nation faces have been long in the making. No one, not even Barack Obama, who brought about an unprecedented shift in American politics, could easily dispatch them. West, just like the right wing politicians, has plenty to say about what is wrong, but offers no solutions. While President Obama did not achieve all that I had hoped for in his first term, I am hopeful and optimistic that he will make meaningful strides toward greater equality for all American citizens. And, no president has ever realized all my hopes and dreams, and it is doubtful that any would or could. But it is a fact that, under President Obama’s leadership, this country has moved forward.

What gets West’s goat, and that of his sidekick Tavis Smiley, is that the search for the “one voice” to replace that of Dr. King as the “leader” of this nation’s African American community has now become a moot one.  It was always a fool’s quest, but one upon which the media enthusiastically embarked upon numerous occasions. It was a journey that many times ended at the doorstep of Tavis or Cornel or Jessie or Al.

But it was Tavis and Cornel who could not adapt.  The fact is they never spoke for me. I sometimes agreed with them, and many times did not. The African American community is not of one monolithic mind. Our beliefs and convictions are represented across the full spectrum of ideologies and opinions.

The bottom line is; what is good for America is good for me, because I am an American. If President Obama’s policies serve America well, then he serves me well, because I am an American. If President Obama honors Doctor King by placing his hand on the bible that gave strength to this iconic American, then I am honored, because I am American.

Cornel West would better serve his country by putting his massive education to work trying to find  solutions to the many problems our country faces, rather than trying to be the number one go-to-Negro on all things Black!

If he wants to be relevant he needs to stop trying to be the chief African American spokesperson. We have one of those. He is the President of the United States.

North Carolina Governor Exonerates Wilmington Ten

By Mildred Robertson
 

 It is done. Ben Chavis, Connie Tindall, Marvin “Chili” Patrick, Wayne Moore, Reginald Epps, Jerry Jacobs, James “Bun” McKoy, Willie Earl Vereen, William “Joe” Wright, Jr. and Ann Shepard will no longer stand convicted of arson and conspiracy. The Wilmington Ten have been exonerated.

After 40 years of struggle the 10 men and women whose names were sullied and whose lives were snatched from them by a racist legal system have received a full pardon from outgoing Democratic Governor Beverly Perdue. It has been one of her last acts as governor, and perhaps one of her most notable.  “In evaluating these petitions for clemency, it is important to separate fact from rumor and innuendo. I have decided to grant these pardons because the more facts I have learned about the Wilmington Ten, the more appalled I have become about the manner in which their convictions were obtained,” Perdue stated.

This action not only clears the names of the men and women wrongly convicted of the 1971 firebombing of a white grocery store in Wilmington, North Carolina. It also begins to repair the harsh image North Carolina suffers as a state notorious for its racism.

It is the birthplace of Sen. Jesse Helms, and the epitome of Southern racism. It is home to the Woolworth lunch counter where A&T University students launched a non-violent sit-in movement that swept the South in the sixties. It is among the infamous states that sponsored the notorious eugenics program that illegally sterilized countless Blacks and others deemed unfit to procreate. Not until April 2003, under Governor Mike Easley, did North Carolina apologize to the victims of this hateful crime, and today still wrestles with the decision to compensate them.

So it is no small victory that the state of North Carolina finally stands up and acknowledges the wrong done to the Wilmington Ten.  The decision comes too late for four of those convicted, who died without ever having the truth be known. The decision took to long for those who struggled to correct the record.

There were many who would not let North Carolina rest. Among them are the NAACP, The Wilmington Journal and other Black Publishers, The Wilmington 10 Committee, the Wilmington Star, the New York Times, MSNBC, celebrities such as Russell Simmons, attorneys James Ferguson and Irv Joyner and many more.

While it will not wipe away the legacy of racism and injustice in the state, this dark chapter in North Carolina’s history will read better now that the truth is told.

Fiscal Cliff Agreement, Tax Hike, Obama

WHAT THE FISCAL CLIFF AGREEMENT MEANS TO YOU

By: Jim Messina, Campaign Manager
Obama for America

The President reached an agreement with Republicans and Democrats in Congress on the "fiscal cliff" that prevents a tax hike on 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses, while fulfilling the President's promise to ask the wealthiest Americans to begin to pay their fair share to reduce the deficit.

President Obama recorded a video to update supporters like you on what's in the agreement and what it means for you

http://my.barackobama.com/Fiscal-Cliff-Agreement

Sandy Hooks Elementary, Assault Rifles, Gun Laws, NRA, Sen. Manchin, Vicki Soto

Guns Don’t Kill People—People With Guns Do!

By Mildred Robertson

You’re kidding, right?  Just when I thought an intelligent conversation could be had regarding gun violence in America, we see the National Rifle Association (NRA) cock its pistol and send politicians fleeing for cover. After coming out earlier this week as an advocate for a sane conversation about gun control, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin repeatedly praised and defended the NRA, saying on Wednesday that he’s “not supporting a ban on anything.”

It is apparent that Manchin was taken to the woodshed for promoting the idea that a discussion of gun laws was imperative following the horrific slaughter of the innocents at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newton, Connecticut. Falling back on the age-old adage that “guns don’t kill people; people kill people,” Manchin tried to defend the interpretation of the 2^nd Amendment as the unfettered right to gun possession.  In his turn-about, he actually pointed to video games as the culprit spawning gun violence, citing the game “Grand Theft Auto” as an example.

Manchin and his gun-toting friends are partially right. While guns don’t kill people, people with guns do. It is unfathomable to me that the NRA or anyone else, for that matter, would fight for the right of the average individual to own a gun that can kill 20 people in a matter of seconds? While I am not a hunter, I am fairly certain you don’t need 20 rounds per second to take down Bambi.

But the truth is that an inordinate number of people are slain each year in America, many in senseless bloodbaths such as the one witnessed in Newton Connecticut. According to the Washington Post, Mother Jones has tracked and mapped every shooting spree over the last three decades. “Since 1982, there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms across the country, with the killings unfolding in 30 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii,” they found. The Post reports that in most cases, the killers had obtained their weapons legally.

It is obvious that the NRA has flexed it sizable political muscle to cow those who might be prepared to enter into serious discussion about reforming gun laws. But our politicians need to be bigger than that. The reform of gun legislation is far past due in this country.

At some point, our political leaders must muster the courage to stand up for what they believe. Just like Vicki Soto in that elementary classroom in Sandy Hooks, they must be willing to step into harms way to protect those over whom they have charge.

http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/joe-manchin-im-so-proud-of-the-nra-85311.html#ixzz2FWsFmzna